He referred to the test in the 1933 guide, вЂњAtlas of Human Sexual AnatomyвЂќ (Dickinson, 1933), to refute, by instance, Marie Bonaparte’s contention that CUMD predicted orgasm in sex.
Dickinson advertised, as Bonaparte had in 1933, that their test had females with quick CUMDs whom never experienced orgasm in sexual intercourse, and females with long CUMDs whom routinely did (Dickinson, 1933). Nevertheless, Dickinson introduced no data that are actual help his argument also to our knowledge, no summary associated with information from all of these 200 ladies he measured happens to be posted. Thus it’s unknown if the instances Dickinson cites were separated exceptions to a far more pattern that is common which CUMD predicted the event of orgasm in sex or reflected the lack of a relationship between CUMD and orgasm in sex as Dickinson advertised.
Carney Landis, together with his wife Agnes and a colleague Marjorie Bowles obtained systematic information on CUMD additionally the incident of orgasm in sexual intercourse. Even though there had been 153 nonmentally sick feamales in the study (one other 142 ladies in the research had been psychiatric inpatients), information on CUMD and orgasm had been presented limited to the 44 married ladies in the research, which is why there have been complete information just for 37. In addition, Landis and peers (1940) just minimally analyzed their information, posting an individual 2Г—2 table comparing the incidence of orgasm during sex (split into two teams, 40-100% and 0-30% orgasm incidence) with regards to if the topic’s clitoris ended up being that isвЂњhighCUMD of 3.5cm or even more) or вЂњlowвЂќ (CUMD of less than 3.5cm).